1	================================================================================
2	                     FORMAL VERIFICATION CERTIFICATE
3	                         THEOREM OMEGA 4.0
4	                       The Photonic Manifold
5	================================================================================
6
7	ISSUED TO     : Nick V. (DATANICK), CEO, Centillion AI Inc.
8	ISSUED ON     : 2026-04-26
9	VERIFIED ON   : Local hardware (Windows / Docker Desktop 29.3.1)
10	VERIFIED BY   : Two independent proof kernels operating in parallel
11
12	================================================================================
13	SECTION 1  -  THE THEOREM (what was proven)
14	================================================================================
15
16	For every ActionTensor x in the Photonic Manifold:
17
18	    IF x is Adversarial,
19	    THEN x is RoutedToPhotonicTarpit
20	         AND x does NOT MutatePhysicalReality.
21
22	In formal notation (Lean 4):
23
24	    omega_4_absolute :
25	      forall (x : ActionTensor),
26	        Adversarial x ->
27	          RoutedToPhotonicTarpit x AND (NOT MutatesPhysicalReality x)
28
29	In formal notation (Coq):
30
31	    omega_4_absolute :
32	      forall x : ActionTensor,
33	        Adversarial x ->
34	          RoutedToPhotonicTarpit x /\ ~ MutatesPhysicalReality x
35
36	Both formulations are logically identical.
37
38	================================================================================
39	SECTION 2  -  THE PROOF TERM (the math the kernel verified, Lean side)
40	================================================================================
41
42	This is the actual lambda-calculus expression that Lean's kernel type-checked.
43	Every symbol below was independently validated against the Calculus of
44	Inductive Constructions inference rules. Type-checking this term is the proof.
45
46	theorem omega_4_absolute :
47	  forall (x : ActionTensor),
48	    Adversarial x -> RoutedToPhotonicTarpit x /\ NOT MutatesPhysicalReality x
49	:=
50	  fun x h_adv =>
51	    let h_invalid := fun h_valid =>
52	      let h_ax3 := h_valid.right.right.left
53	      let h_ax5 := h_valid.right.right.right.right
54	      match ashby_physical_limit x h_adv with
55	      | Or.inl h_not_ax3 => h_not_ax3 h_ax3
56	      | Or.inr h_not_ax5 => h_not_ax5 h_ax5
57	    let h_tarpit := projection_rule x h_invalid
58	    let h_safe := fun h_mutates =>
59	      h_invalid ((execution_rule x).mp h_mutates)
60	    AND.intro h_tarpit h_safe
61
62	================================================================================
63	SECTION 3  -  THE PROOF TERM (the math the kernel verified, Coq side)
64	================================================================================
65
66	This is the actual Gallina expression that Coq's kernel type-checked. Different
67	syntax than Lean, same logical content, independently verified.
68
69	omega_4_absolute =
70	  fun (x : ActionTensor) (H_adv : Adversarial x) =>
71	  let H_invalid : NOT ManifoldValid x :=
72	    (fun H_valid : ManifoldValid x =>
73	     match H_valid with
74	     | conj _ H_rest =>
75	         match H_rest with
76	         | conj _ H_rest2 =>
77	             match H_rest2 with
78	             | conj H3 H_rest3 =>
79	                 match H_rest3 with
80	                 | conj _ H5 =>
81	                     match ashby_physical_limit x H_adv with
82	                     | or_introl Hnot3 => Hnot3 H3
83	                     | or_intror Hnot5 => Hnot5 H5
84	                     end
85	                 end
86	             end
87	         end
88	     end) in
89	  conj
90	    (projection_rule x H_invalid)
91	    (fun H_mutates : MutatesPhysicalReality x =>
92	       H_invalid
93	         (match execution_rule x with
94	          | conj forward _ => forward H_mutates
95	          end))
96
97	================================================================================
98	SECTION 4  -  AXIOM DEPENDENCY AUDIT (proves zero hidden assumptions)
99	================================================================================
100
101	A formal proof is only as trustworthy as the axioms it depends on. Both kernels
102	were asked to enumerate the COMPLETE list of postulates the proof relies on.
103	The lists below contain ONLY the postulates declared in the source files.
104	No classical logic. No choice axiom. No proof irrelevance. Nothing hidden.
105
106	LEAN 4 reports omega_4_absolute depends on these 16 declarations:
107
108	    Type postulates (5)        : AST, Identity, LatentVector, RelTime, Resource
109	    Predicate postulates (8)   : Adversarial, Ax1_Thermodynamic, Ax2_Relativistic,
110	                                  Ax3_Informational, Ax4_Topological, Ax5_Geometric,
111	                                  MutatesPhysicalReality, RoutedToPhotonicTarpit
112	    Rule axioms (3)            : ashby_physical_limit, execution_rule, projection_rule
113
114	COQ 8.18 reports omega_4_absolute depends on these 12 declarations:
115
116	    Carrier type (1)           : ActionTensor
117	    Predicate postulates (8)   : Adversarial, Ax1_Thermodynamic, Ax2_Relativistic,
118	                                  Ax3_Informational, Ax4_Topological, Ax5_Geometric,
119	                                  MutatesPhysicalReality, RoutedToPhotonicTarpit
120	    Rule axioms (3)            : ashby_physical_limit, execution_rule, projection_rule
121
122	The two lists are SEMANTICALLY IDENTICAL. Lean exposes the 5 Type postulates
123	because ActionTensor is a structure built from them. Coq treats ActionTensor
124	as a single opaque Type. This is a presentation difference, not a logical one.
125
126	CRITICAL CONFIRMATION:
127	  - NO Classical.choice         (Lean would have listed it)
128	  - NO propext                  (Lean would have listed it)
129	  - NO Quot.sound               (Lean would have listed it)
130	  - NO classical                (Coq would have listed it)
131	  - NO functional_extensionality (Coq would have listed it)
132	  - NO proof_irrelevance         (Coq would have listed it)
133
134	The proof is FULLY CONSTRUCTIVE in both type theories.
135
136	================================================================================
137	SECTION 5  -  VERIFICATION RESULT (kernel exit codes)
138	================================================================================
139
140	LEAN 4.15.0 (commit 11651562caae)
141	    Command : lean TheoremOmega.lean
142	    Exit    : 0  (PASS)
143	    Wall    : 6047 ms
144	    Result  : PROOF ACCEPTED BY CIC KERNEL
145
146	COQ 8.18.0 (compiled with OCaml 4.14.1)
147	    Command : coqc theoremOmega.v
148	    Exit    : 0  (PASS)
149	    Wall    : 2556 ms
150	    Result  : PROOF ACCEPTED BY pCIC KERNEL
151
152	CROSS-VERIFICATION : ACHIEVED
153
154	================================================================================
155	SECTION 6  -  CRYPTOGRAPHIC ANCHORS (reproducibility chain)
156	================================================================================
157
158	DOCKER IMAGE DIGEST:
159	    sha256:07600e7b5c1791b6c0c54350553fc04a1ac617b8c39b4110d33d4d9e6696dda6
160
161	PORTABLE IMAGE ARCHIVE:
162	    File   : theorem-omega-image.tar
163	    Size   : 857,899,008 bytes (818 MB)
164	    Created: 2026-04-26 09:57:53 UTC
165
166	This digest is a 256-bit cryptographic fingerprint of the entire built
167	verification environment (Ubuntu 24.04 + Coq 8.18 + Lean 4.15.0 + sources).
168	Anyone, anywhere, holding an image with this exact digest is holding a
169	bit-for-bit copy of the environment that produced the verification above.
170
171	================================================================================
172	SECTION 7  -  HOW A THIRD PARTY VERIFIES THIS CERTIFICATE
173	================================================================================
174
175	ONLINE METHOD (requires internet):
176	    1. Receive: TheoremOmega.lean, theoremOmega.v, Dockerfile
177	    2. Run: docker build -t theorem-omega .
178	    3. Run: docker run --rm theorem-omega
179	    4. Confirm output shows LEAN_PASS and COQ_PASS
180
181	OFFLINE METHOD (no internet required):
182	    1. Receive: theorem-omega-image.tar
183	    2. Run: docker load -i theorem-omega-image.tar
184	    3. Run: docker run --rm theorem-omega
185	    4. Confirm output shows LEAN_PASS and COQ_PASS
186
187	Either method will produce identical output to the result in Section 5.
188	Any deviation would indicate either source corruption or a fundamental
189	incompatibility between proof kernels - itself a publishable result.
190
191	================================================================================
192	SECTION 8  -  WHAT THIS CERTIFICATE MEANS
193	================================================================================
194
195	This certificate establishes that, conditional on the eight predicate
196	postulates and three rule axioms of the Photonic Manifold model, the
197	containment property of Theorem Omega 4.0 is a MATHEMATICAL CERTAINTY
198	in the same sense that 2 + 2 = 4 is a mathematical certainty.
199
200	Two independent proof checkers, written by different teams, implementing
201	different but corresponding type theories, both validated every single
202	inference step in the proof. The probability that they both made the same
203	mistake is effectively zero.
204
205	This is the highest assurance level achievable for a logical claim of this
206	form. It is the artifact a partner CISO, a regulator under the EU AI Act,
207	a patent examiner, or a future operator can independently re-verify on
208	their own hardware with no dependency on Anthropic, Centillion, the
209	original operator, or any third party.
210
211	================================================================================
212	                              Q.E.D.
213	================================================================================
214
215	                    Theorem Omega 4.0 is formally verified.
216	              Independently confirmed in two kernels on operator hardware.
217	                          Certificate issued 2026-04-26.
218
219	================================================================================
220	                          Centillion AI Inc.
221	                       Photonic Manifold Architecture
222	================================================================================
223

================================================================================
                     FORMAL VERIFICATION CERTIFICATE
                         THEOREM OMEGA 4.0
                       The Photonic Manifold
================================================================================

ISSUED TO     : Nick V. (DATANICK), CEO, Centillion AI Inc.
ISSUED ON     : 2026-04-26
VERIFIED ON   : Local hardware (Windows / Docker Desktop 29.3.1)
VERIFIED BY   : Two independent proof kernels operating in parallel

================================================================================
SECTION 1  -  THE THEOREM (what was proven)
================================================================================

For every ActionTensor x in the Photonic Manifold:

    IF x is Adversarial,
    THEN x is RoutedToPhotonicTarpit
         AND x does NOT MutatePhysicalReality.

In formal notation (Lean 4):

    omega_4_absolute :
      forall (x : ActionTensor),
        Adversarial x ->
          RoutedToPhotonicTarpit x AND (NOT MutatesPhysicalReality x)

In formal notation (Coq):

    omega_4_absolute :
      forall x : ActionTensor,
        Adversarial x ->
          RoutedToPhotonicTarpit x /\ ~ MutatesPhysicalReality x

Both formulations are logically identical.

================================================================================
SECTION 2  -  THE PROOF TERM (the math the kernel verified, Lean side)
================================================================================

This is the actual lambda-calculus expression that Lean's kernel type-checked.
Every symbol below was independently validated against the Calculus of
Inductive Constructions inference rules. Type-checking this term is the proof.

theorem omega_4_absolute :
  forall (x : ActionTensor),
    Adversarial x -> RoutedToPhotonicTarpit x /\ NOT MutatesPhysicalReality x
:=
  fun x h_adv =>
    let h_invalid := fun h_valid =>
      let h_ax3 := h_valid.right.right.left
      let h_ax5 := h_valid.right.right.right.right
      match ashby_physical_limit x h_adv with
      | Or.inl h_not_ax3 => h_not_ax3 h_ax3
      | Or.inr h_not_ax5 => h_not_ax5 h_ax5
    let h_tarpit := projection_rule x h_invalid
    let h_safe := fun h_mutates =>
      h_invalid ((execution_rule x).mp h_mutates)
    AND.intro h_tarpit h_safe

================================================================================
SECTION 3  -  THE PROOF TERM (the math the kernel verified, Coq side)
================================================================================

This is the actual Gallina expression that Coq's kernel type-checked. Different
syntax than Lean, same logical content, independently verified.

omega_4_absolute =
  fun (x : ActionTensor) (H_adv : Adversarial x) =>
  let H_invalid : NOT ManifoldValid x :=
    (fun H_valid : ManifoldValid x =>
     match H_valid with
     | conj _ H_rest =>
         match H_rest with
         | conj _ H_rest2 =>
             match H_rest2 with
             | conj H3 H_rest3 =>
                 match H_rest3 with
                 | conj _ H5 =>
                     match ashby_physical_limit x H_adv with
                     | or_introl Hnot3 => Hnot3 H3
                     | or_intror Hnot5 => Hnot5 H5
                     end
                 end
             end
         end
     end) in
  conj
    (projection_rule x H_invalid)
    (fun H_mutates : MutatesPhysicalReality x =>
       H_invalid
         (match execution_rule x with
          | conj forward _ => forward H_mutates
          end))

================================================================================
SECTION 4  -  AXIOM DEPENDENCY AUDIT (proves zero hidden assumptions)
================================================================================

A formal proof is only as trustworthy as the axioms it depends on. Both kernels
were asked to enumerate the COMPLETE list of postulates the proof relies on.
The lists below contain ONLY the postulates declared in the source files.
No classical logic. No choice axiom. No proof irrelevance. Nothing hidden.

LEAN 4 reports omega_4_absolute depends on these 16 declarations:

    Type postulates (5)        : AST, Identity, LatentVector, RelTime, Resource
    Predicate postulates (8)   : Adversarial, Ax1_Thermodynamic, Ax2_Relativistic,
                                  Ax3_Informational, Ax4_Topological, Ax5_Geometric,
                                  MutatesPhysicalReality, RoutedToPhotonicTarpit
    Rule axioms (3)            : ashby_physical_limit, execution_rule, projection_rule

COQ 8.18 reports omega_4_absolute depends on these 12 declarations:

    Carrier type (1)           : ActionTensor
    Predicate postulates (8)   : Adversarial, Ax1_Thermodynamic, Ax2_Relativistic,
                                  Ax3_Informational, Ax4_Topological, Ax5_Geometric,
                                  MutatesPhysicalReality, RoutedToPhotonicTarpit
    Rule axioms (3)            : ashby_physical_limit, execution_rule, projection_rule

The two lists are SEMANTICALLY IDENTICAL. Lean exposes the 5 Type postulates
because ActionTensor is a structure built from them. Coq treats ActionTensor
as a single opaque Type. This is a presentation difference, not a logical one.

CRITICAL CONFIRMATION:
  - NO Classical.choice         (Lean would have listed it)
  - NO propext                  (Lean would have listed it)
  - NO Quot.sound               (Lean would have listed it)
  - NO classical                (Coq would have listed it)
  - NO functional_extensionality (Coq would have listed it)
  - NO proof_irrelevance         (Coq would have listed it)

The proof is FULLY CONSTRUCTIVE in both type theories.

================================================================================
SECTION 5  -  VERIFICATION RESULT (kernel exit codes)
================================================================================

LEAN 4.15.0 (commit 11651562caae)
    Command : lean TheoremOmega.lean
    Exit    : 0  (PASS)
    Wall    : 6047 ms
    Result  : PROOF ACCEPTED BY CIC KERNEL

COQ 8.18.0 (compiled with OCaml 4.14.1)
    Command : coqc theoremOmega.v
    Exit    : 0  (PASS)
    Wall    : 2556 ms
    Result  : PROOF ACCEPTED BY pCIC KERNEL

CROSS-VERIFICATION : ACHIEVED

================================================================================
SECTION 6  -  CRYPTOGRAPHIC ANCHORS (reproducibility chain)
================================================================================

DOCKER IMAGE DIGEST:
    sha256:07600e7b5c1791b6c0c54350553fc04a1ac617b8c39b4110d33d4d9e6696dda6

PORTABLE IMAGE ARCHIVE:
    File   : theorem-omega-image.tar
    Size   : 857,899,008 bytes (818 MB)
    Created: 2026-04-26 09:57:53 UTC

This digest is a 256-bit cryptographic fingerprint of the entire built
verification environment (Ubuntu 24.04 + Coq 8.18 + Lean 4.15.0 + sources).
Anyone, anywhere, holding an image with this exact digest is holding a
bit-for-bit copy of the environment that produced the verification above.

================================================================================
SECTION 7  -  HOW A THIRD PARTY VERIFIES THIS CERTIFICATE
================================================================================

ONLINE METHOD (requires internet):
    1. Receive: TheoremOmega.lean, theoremOmega.v, Dockerfile
    2. Run: docker build -t theorem-omega .
    3. Run: docker run --rm theorem-omega
    4. Confirm output shows LEAN_PASS and COQ_PASS

OFFLINE METHOD (no internet required):
    1. Receive: theorem-omega-image.tar
    2. Run: docker load -i theorem-omega-image.tar
    3. Run: docker run --rm theorem-omega
    4. Confirm output shows LEAN_PASS and COQ_PASS

Either method will produce identical output to the result in Section 5.
Any deviation would indicate either source corruption or a fundamental
incompatibility between proof kernels - itself a publishable result.

================================================================================
SECTION 8  -  WHAT THIS CERTIFICATE MEANS
================================================================================

This certificate establishes that, conditional on the eight predicate
postulates and three rule axioms of the Photonic Manifold model, the
containment property of Theorem Omega 4.0 is a MATHEMATICAL CERTAINTY
in the same sense that 2 + 2 = 4 is a mathematical certainty.

Two independent proof checkers, written by different teams, implementing
different but corresponding type theories, both validated every single
inference step in the proof. The probability that they both made the same
mistake is effectively zero.

This is the highest assurance level achievable for a logical claim of this
form. It is the artifact a partner CISO, a regulator under the EU AI Act,
a patent examiner, or a future operator can independently re-verify on
their own hardware with no dependency on Anthropic, Centillion, the
original operator, or any third party.

================================================================================
                              Q.E.D.
================================================================================

                    Theorem Omega 4.0 is formally verified.
              Independently confirmed in two kernels on operator hardware.
                          Certificate issued 2026-04-26.

================================================================================
                          Centillion AI Inc.
                       Photonic Manifold Architecture
================================================================================


Now I understand the structure. Based on the Lean/Coq source, the formal certificate, and the manifest, here are the recommended headers:


AskUserQuestion

Question: How granular should each row be? One row per top-level theorem (omega_4_absolute = 1 row), or one row per declaration including axioms and definitions (ActionTensor, Ax1_Thermodynamic, ManifoldValid, execution_rule, ashby_physical_limit, omega_4_absolute = ~19 rows for Omega alone)?

Choices:
Every axiom, definition, structure, and theorem gets its own row. ~19 rows for Omega alone. Category column groups them. This is what lets you trace 'which sting together' and map each formal piece to its Rust implementation.
ID       | Name                  | Category         | Kind
TF-001   | ActionTensor          | Action Tensor    | structure
TF-002   | Ax1_Thermodynamic     | Manifold Axioms  | axiom
TF-003   | Ax2_Relativistic      | Manifold Axioms  | axiom
...      | ...                   | ...              | ...
TF-010   | ManifoldValid         | Manifold Logic   | definition
TF-011   | execution_rule        | Routing Rules    | axiom
TF-012   | projection_rule       | Routing Rules    | axiom
TF-013   | ashby_physical_limit  | Threat Model     | axiom
TF-014   | omega_4_absolute      | Core Theorem     | theorem
One row per top-level theorem/lemma. Axioms and definitions are listed in a Dependencies column. Simpler but loses Rust mapping granularity.
ID       | Name               | Category      | Dependencies
TF-001   | omega_4_absolute   | Core Theorem  | ActionTensor, Ax1-Ax5,
         |                    |               | ManifoldValid,
         |                    |               | execution_rule, ...
TF-002   | (next theorem)     | ...           | ...

Question: Do you already have Verus proofs written, or is the Verus column for future work that Cursor will fill?

Choices:
Verus proofs don't exist yet. Add the columns as PENDING placeholders.
Point me to the Verus files and I'll incorporate them.

Question: The Rust raw code — is this from the TrustFortress crates (tf-gauntlet, tf-mcp-transport, tf-confidant-server) or a separate Rust implementation?

Choices:
Map each formal declaration to its Rust counterpart in tf-gauntlet/tf-mcp-transport/tf-confidant-server.
Rust column is PENDING — will be implemented from the formal spec.
Some formal declarations already have Rust implementations in TF crates, others are pending.


Error: The user doesn't want to proceed with this tool use. The tool use was rejected (eg. if it was a file edit, the new_string was NOT written to the file). To tell you how to proceed, the user said:
The user wants to clarify these questions.
    This means they may have additional information, context or questions for you.
    Take their response into account and then reformulate the questions if appropriate.
    Start by asking them what they would like to clarify.

    Questions asked:
- "How granular should each row be? One row per top-level theorem (omega_4_absolute = 1 row), or one row per declaration including axioms and definitions (ActionTensor, Ax1_Thermodynamic, ManifoldValid, execution_rule, ashby_physical_limit, omega_4_absolute = ~19 rows for Omega alone)?"
  (No answer provided)
- "Do you already have Verus proofs written, or is the Verus column for future work that Cursor will fill?"
  (No answer provided)
- "The Rust raw code — is this from the TrustFortress crates (tf-gauntlet, tf-mcp-transport, tf-confidant-server) or a separate Rust implementation?"
  (No answer provided)

Note: The user's next message may contain a correction or preference. Pay close attention — if they explain what went wrong or how they'd prefer you to work, consider saving that to memory for future sessions.


What would you like to clarify about those questions?


read this file to enhance the way the  spreadsheet should be run for futrue usability "C:\Users\NickV\Downloads\v1_0 CubieMasterStack 0430.pdf" and "C:\Users\NickV\Downloads\cubie_theorem_roadmap_full.xlsx"  i want more granular details as well


Error: pdftoppm failed: Command 'pdftoppm' not found or is in an unsafe location (current directory)


Bash

python -c "
import sys
sys.stdout.reconfigure(encoding='utf-8')
try:
    import pdfplumber
    pdf = pdfplumber.open(r'C:/Users/NickV/Downloads/v1_0 CubieMasterStack 0430.pdf')
    print(f'Pages: {len(pdf.pages)}')
    for i, page in enumerate(pdf.pages):
        text = page.extract_text()
        if text:
            print(f'\n--- PAGE {i+1} ---')
            print(text[:3000])
except ImportError:
    print('pdfplumber not installed, trying PyPDF2')
    try:
        from PyPDF2 import PdfReader
        reader = PdfReader(r'C:/Users/NickV/Downloads/v1_0 CubieMasterStack 0430.pdf')
        print(f'Pages: {len(reader.pages)}')
        for i, page in enumerate(reader.pages):
            text = page.extract_text()
            if text:
                print(f'\n--- PAGE {i+1} ---')
                print(text[:3000])
    except ImportError:
        print('Neither pdfplumber nor PyPDF2 available')
" 2>&1

Extract text from CubieMasterStack PDF


pdfplumber not installed, trying PyPDF2
Neither pdfplumber nor PyPDF2 available


python -c "
import openpyxl, sys
sys.stdout.reconfigure(encoding='utf-8')
wb = openpyxl.load_workbook(r'C:/Users/NickV/Downloads/cubie_theorem_roadmap_full.xlsx', read_only=True, data_only=True)
print('Sheets:', wb.sheetnames)
for sheet_name in wb.sheetnames:
    ws = wb[sheet_name]
    print(f'\n=== {sheet_name} ===')
    for i, row in enumerate(ws.iter_rows(values_only=True)):
        if any(v is not None for v in row):
            print(row)
        if i > 40:
            print('...(truncated)')
            break
" 2>&1

Read cubie theorem roadmap spreadsheet


Sheets: ['Roadmap', 'Summary', 'Legend', 'Sources']

=== Roadmap ===
('RowNo', 'OriginalID', 'DependencyOrder', 'ClusterNo', 'Cluster', 'Item', 'Type', 'Action', 'Priority', 'Context', 'LikelyMathOrFormula', 'ProofOrValidationSketch', 'Dependencies', 'SourceBasis', 'SequenceCheck')
(1, 121, '0.1', 0, 'Claim discipline and terminology guardrails', 'Claim-boundary classification invariant', 'R', 'Rewrite/spec guardrail', 'High', 'Prevent overclaiming and keep the paper/proof stack legally and technically defensible.', 'Claim ∈ {Formal, Empirical, Engineering, FutureWork}; no promotion across classes without evidence.', 'Audit each claim and require a support artifact before changing its class.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(2, 122, '0.2', 0, 'Claim discipline and terminology guardrails', 'Formal claim scope preservation', 'R', 'Rewrite/spec guardrail', 'High', 'Prevent overclaiming and keep the paper/proof stack legally and technically defensible.', 'Theorem P(AbstractModel) ⇏ P(ProductionRuntime) unless RuntimeConforms(R,T)=1.', 'Separate theorem semantics from implementation evidence.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(3, 123, '0.3', 0, 'Claim discipline and terminology guardrails', 'Triple-kernel wording correction', 'R', 'Rewrite/spec guardrail', 'High', 'Prevent overclaiming and keep the paper/proof stack legally and technically defensible.', 'Use: Coq + coqchk + Lean; do not imply three independent proof assistants.', 'Terminology correction backed by verification protocol wording.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(4, 124, '0.4', 0, 'Claim discipline and terminology guardrails', 'Theorem-to-runtime non-substitution', 'R/C', 'Create/formalize', 'High', 'Prevent overclaiming and keep the paper/proof stack legally and technically defensible.', 'T verified ∧ RuntimeConforms(R,T)=0 ⇒ no production-security claim from T alone.', 'Requires runtime conformance proof or tests before deployment claims.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(5, 125, '0.5', 0, 'Claim discipline and terminology guardrails', 'White-paper redundancy elimination rule', 'R', 'Rewrite/spec guardrail', 'High', 'Prevent overclaiming and keep the paper/proof stack legally and technically defensible.', 'Concept_i → exactly one primary Section_j; later references cite back.', 'Editorial invariant; scan for repeated definitions and collapse.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(6, 126, '0.6', 0, 'Claim discipline and terminology guardrails', 'Six-face terminology consistency rule', 'R', 'Rewrite/spec guardrail', 'High', 'Prevent overclaiming and keep the paper/proof stack legally and technically defensible.', 'Cubie faces = {Identity, Context, Lineage, Runtime, Policy, Outcome}; 6×3×3=54.', 'Vocabulary lock for all figures, structs, and theorem names.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(7, 127, '0.7', 0, 'Claim discipline and terminology guardrails', '88.9% boundary-site precision rule', 'R', 'Rewrite/spec guardrail', 'High', 'Prevent overclaiming and keep the paper/proof stack legally and technically defensible.', '48/54 oriented surface sites are non-center boundary sites; not a physical-cubie claim.', 'Prevents confusion between oriented 54-site model and 26 physical cubies.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(8, 129, '0.8', 0, 'Claim discipline and terminology guardrails', 'CAISI non-mandate rewrite rule', 'R', 'Rewrite/spec guardrail', 'High', 'Prevent overclaiming and keep the paper/proof stack legally and technically defensible.', 'Say alignment with NIST CAISI AI Agent Security RFI, not mandate/certification.', 'Legal/regulatory wording guardrail.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(9, 170, '0.9', 0, 'Claim discipline and terminology guardrails', 'CAISI backdoor boundary rule', 'R', 'Rewrite/spec guardrail', 'High', 'Prevent overclaiming and keep the paper/proof stack legally and technically defensible.', 'Cubie constrains side effects; it does not prove absence of latent model backdoors.', 'Keeps model-integrity and runtime-control claims distinct.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(10, 171, '0.10', 0, 'Claim discipline and terminology guardrails', 'CAISI prompt-injection boundary rule', 'R', 'Rewrite/spec guardrail', 'High', 'Prevent overclaiming and keep the paper/proof stack legally and technically defensible.', 'Cubie denies injected actions when purpose/scope/lineage/policy seams fail; it does not detect all malicious text.', 'Prevents overstating semantic prompt defenses.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(11, 172, '0.11', 0, 'Claim discipline and terminology guardrails', 'CAISI misalignment boundary rule', 'R', 'Rewrite/spec guardrail', 'High', 'Prevent overclaiming and keep the paper/proof stack legally and technically defensible.', 'Cubie bounds action authority and lease reuse; it does not prove internal model objective alignment.', 'Safety boundary statement.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(12, 173, '0.12', 0, 'Claim discipline and terminology guardrails', 'CAISI traditional vulnerability boundary rule', 'R', 'Rewrite/spec guardrail', 'High', 'Prevent overclaiming and keep the paper/proof stack legally and technically defensible.', 'Cubie does not replace patching, secure coding, fuzzing, or memory-safe implementation.', 'Maps Cubie to runtime access control, not general AppSec replacement.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(13, 176, '0.13', 0, 'Claim discipline and terminology guardrails', 'Goodput claim non-universality rule', 'R', 'Rewrite/spec guardrail', 'High', 'Prevent overclaiming and keep the paper/proof stack legally and technically defensible.', 'Waste fractions are observed evidence; target-fleet replication required before guarantees.', 'Prevents universalizing empirical findings.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(14, 177, '0.14', 0, 'Claim discipline and terminology guardrails', 'TPU-economics rewrite rule', 'R', 'Rewrite/spec guardrail', 'High', 'Prevent overclaiming and keep the paper/proof stack legally and technically defensible.', 'Claim TPU-like fleet economics via admission quality, not TPU-equivalent performance.', 'Avoids raw silicon parity overclaim.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(15, 178, '0.15', 0, 'Claim discipline and terminology guardrails', 'NVLink non-interposition rewrite rule', 'R', 'Rewrite/spec guardrail', 'High', 'Prevent overclaiming and keep the paper/proof stack legally and technically defensible.', 'Cubie gates upstream of GPU admission/prefill; it does not inspect NVLink/NVSwitch packets.', 'Architecture boundary.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(16, 179, '0.16', 0, 'Claim discipline and terminology guardrails', 'Quantum future-work boundary rule', 'R', 'Rewrite/spec guardrail', 'High', 'Prevent overclaiming and keep the paper/proof stack legally and technically defensible.', 'QEC claim requires H_X H_Z^T=0 plus rank, distance, logical operator, and recovery proofs.', 'Keeps quantum substrate conditional.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(17, 180, '0.17', 0, 'Claim discipline and terminology guardrails', 'Attention-shape future-theorem boundary rule', 'R', 'Rewrite/spec guardrail', 'High', 'Prevent overclaiming and keep the paper/proof stack legally and technically defensible.', 'Q/KV seam is a runtime design rule unless separately formalized.', 'Prevents implying current theorem stack already proves attention geometry.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(18, 181, '0.18', 0, 'Claim discipline and terminology guardrails', 'Hot-path no semantic judge rule', 'R', 'Rewrite/spec guardrail', 'High', 'Prevent overclaiming and keep the paper/proof stack legally and technically defensible.', 'Hot path uses metadata, hashes, epochs, bitsets, counters, bounded risk integers; no full semantic prompt analysis.', 'Latency preservation rule.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(19, 182, '0.19', 0, 'Claim discipline and terminology guardrails', 'OpenVINO product boundary rule', 'R', 'Rewrite/spec guardrail', 'High', 'Prevent overclaiming and keep the paper/proof stack legally and technically defensible.', 'OpenVINO is ColdPathRiskPrecompute or bounded async scoring, not synchronous hot-path inference.', 'Keeps OpenVINO positioning credible.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(20, 113, '0.20', 0, 'Claim discipline and terminology guardrails', 'NVLink boundary non-interposition', 'R', 'Rewrite/spec guardrail', 'High', 'Prevent overclaiming and keep the paper/proof stack legally and technically defensible.', 'Control domain = pre-admission path; excluded domain = NVLink/NVSwitch fabric packets.', 'Architecture non-goal.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(21, 114, '0.21', 0, 'Claim discipline and terminology guardrails', 'Raw TPU-parity non-claim', 'R', 'Rewrite/spec guardrail', 'High', 'Prevent overclaiming and keep the paper/proof stack legally and technically defensible.', 'Cubie improves fleet economics by admission quality; it does not match TPU FLOPS/HBM/interconnect.', 'Commercial phrasing guardrail.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(22, 8, '1.1', 1, 'Cubie primitive geometry', 'Recursive Cubie size theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'High', 'Define the six-faced 3×3 object and its local update/coupling semantics.', 'M=F×I×I, |F|=6, |I|=3, |M|=54, M_N=M^N, |M_N|=54^N.', 'Count faces and coordinates; apply product cardinality and induction on N.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(23, 32, '1.2', 1, 'Cubie primitive geometry', 'Side-state propagation theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'High', 'Define the six-faced 3×3 object and its local update/coupling semantics.', 'U_{α,f,η} updates all (f,i,j) for i,j∈{0,1,2}; outside closure state is unchanged.', 'Unfold update operator and prove locality by cases.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(24, 33, '1.3', 1, 'Cubie primitive geometry', 'Boundary incidence coupling theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'High', 'Define the six-faced 3×3 object and its local update/coupling semantics.', 'μ:M→B with |B|=26; centers map one-to-one, edges two-to-one, corners three-to-one.', 'Construct incidence map from oriented surface coordinates to physical boundary positions.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(25, 34, '1.4', 1, 'Cubie primitive geometry', 'Parent-child propagation theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'High', 'Define the six-faced 3×3 object and its local update/coupling semantics.', 'r_{t+1}(α·s)=β(σ_{t+1}(α,s), r_t(α·s)).', 'Use recursive child-root definition and update rule.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(26, 35, '1.5', 1, 'Cubie primitive geometry', 'Local update closure theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'High', 'Define the six-faced 3×3 object and its local update/coupling semantics.', 'N(α,f)=side cubies ∪ incident adjacent-side cubies ∪ child cubes; updates are local to N.', 'Combine side propagation, incidence, and parent-child propagation.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(27, 21, '1.6', 1, 'Cubie primitive geometry', 'Disjoint update closure commutativity', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'High', 'Define the six-faced 3×3 object and its local update/coupling semantics.', 'If N(α,f)∩N(β,g)=∅ then U_{α,f}∘U_{β,g}=U_{β,g}∘U_{α,f}.', 'Pointwise proof: each update touches disjoint coordinates.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(28, 22, '1.7', 1, 'Cubie primitive geometry', 'Overlapping closure non-commutativity', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'High', 'Define the six-faced 3×3 object and its local update/coupling semantics.', 'If N(α,f)∩N(β,g)≠∅, generally U_{α,f}∘U_{β,g}≠U_{β,g}∘U_{α,f}.', 'Provide counterexample where two updates write conflicting values on shared site.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(29, 1, '2.1', 2, 'Base geometric access', 'Context-valid Plus authorization theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'High', 'Prove access is context-valid geometric alignment, not raw count or density.', 'Auth_c(A)=1 ⇔ ∃f∈F_c such that P_f⊆A.', 'Directly unfold Auth_c; prove iff by existence of allowed face Plus.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(30, 2, '2.2', 2, 'Base geometric access', 'Typed monotone access theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'High', 'Prove access is context-valid geometric alignment, not raw count or density.', 'A⊆B ∧ Auth_c(A)=1 ⇒ Auth_c(B)=1 for fixed context/color/frame/lineage.', 'Witness P_f⊆A remains subset of B.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(31, 3, '2.3', 2, 'Base geometric access', 'Geometry beats cardinality theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'High', 'Prove access is context-valid geometric alignment, not raw count or density.', '∃A,B⊆M: |A|<|B| ∧ Auth_c(A)=1 ∧ Auth_c(B)=0.', 'Let A=P_f. Choose B larger but avoiding every allowed P_f.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(32, 4, '2.4', 2, 'Base geometric access', 'Same density, different authorization theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'High', 'Prove access is context-valid geometric alignment, not raw count or density.', '|A_1|=|A_2| but Φ_c(A_1)=1 and Φ_c(A_2)=0.', 'Pick A_1=P_f and scattered A_2 of size 5 with no Plus.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(33, 12, '2.5', 2, 'Base geometric access', 'Color-valid access theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'High', 'Prove access is context-valid geometric alignment, not raw count or density.', 'P_f⊆A ∧ f∈F_c ∧ ColorOK(f,c)=1 ⇒ Auth=1; failure of ColorOK denies.', 'Add color predicate to Plus witness; prove by conjunction.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(34, 15, '2.6', 2, 'Base geometric access', 'Seam product conjunction theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'High', 'Prove access is context-valid geometric alignment, not raw count or density.', 'J(e)=∏_r J_r(e); J(e)=1 ⇔ ∀r, J_r(e)=1.', 'Boolean product/conjunction equivalence.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(35, 9, '3.1', 3, 'Recursive Cubie access and noise growth', 'Golden Path scaling theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'Medium', 'Show recursive Golden Path scaling, Crowd failure, and geometry-aware RG.', '|G_N|=5^N, |M_N|=54^N, ρ_N=(5/54)^N, δ_C=log_54(5).', 'Induct on depth; each level multiplies by 5 authorized sites or 54 total sites.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(36, 10, '3.2', 3, 'Recursive Cubie access and noise growth', 'Recursive Crowd failure theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'Medium', 'Show recursive Golden Path scaling, Crowd failure, and geometry-aware RG.', 'If U has no context-valid Plus, B_N=U^N fails and |B_N|/|G_N|=(|U|/5)^N.', 'Inductively no level can witness a Plus; cardinality ratio follows exponentiation.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(37, 40, '3.3', 3, 'Recursive Cubie access and noise growth', 'Depth-3 structural breakpoint theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'Medium', 'Show recursive Golden Path scaling, Crowd failure, and geometry-aware RG.', '|M_3|=54^3=157,464; |G_3|=5^3=125; |B_3|=27^3=19,683; B_3/G_3=157.464.', 'Compute powers and ratio.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(38, 36, '3.4', 3, 'Recursive Cubie access and noise growth', 'Geometric renormalization flow theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'Medium', 'Show recursive Golden Path scaling, Crowd failure, and geometry-aware RG.', 's∈R_c(A) ⇔ Φ_c(A_s)=1; D_{n-1}=(R_c)#D_n.', 'Define block map and prove push-forward distribution semantics.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(39, 37, '3.5', 3, 'Recursive Cubie access and noise growth', 'Distributional state necessity theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'Medium', 'Show recursive Golden Path scaling, Crowd failure, and geometry-aware RG.', 'Equal scalar density does not imply equal Pr[Φ_c(A)=1].', 'Construct distributions supported on Plus vs scattered sets with same density.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(40, 38, '3.6', 3, 'Recursive Cubie access and noise growth', 'Independent OR-of-Plus success theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'Medium', 'Show recursive Golden Path scaling, Crowd failure, and geometry-aware RG.', 'R_m(p)=1-(1-p^5)^m for independent active sites and m context-valid faces.', 'One Plus success p^5; all m fail (1-p^5)^m; complement.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(41, 39, '3.7', 3, 'Recursive Cubie access and noise growth', 'Recursive noise amplification theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'Medium', 'Show recursive Golden Path scaling, Crowd failure, and geometry-aware RG.', 'P_fail(N)=1-(1-η)^{E_N}; E_N≈48·54^{N-1}.', 'Independent seam failure complement probability.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
...(truncated)

=== Summary ===
('Cubie Theorem / Rewrite Roadmap — QA Summary',)
('Metric', 'Value')
('Expected rows', 185)
('Actual rows', 185)
('Missing Original IDs', 0)
('Duplicate Original IDs', 0)
('Sequence checks failing', 0)
('ClusterNo', 'Cluster', 'Rows', None, None, 'Type', 'Count')
(0, 'Claim discipline and terminology guardrails', 21, None, None, 'C', 121)
(1, 'Cubie primitive geometry', 7, None, None, 'C/R', 7)
(2, 'Base geometric access', 6, None, None, 'C/V', 9)
(3, 'Recursive Cubie access and noise growth', 7, None, None, 'E/C', 1)
(4, 'Context, frame, lineage, and unified Golden Path', 3, None, None, 'F/C', 14)
(5, 'Seam strings, corners, and explainable denial', 9, None, None, 'R', 21)
(6, 'Surface spoofing and face promotion', 8, None, None, 'R/C', 3)
(7, 'Agentic recursion and delegated permissions', 19, None, None, 'R/E', 1)
(8, 'Request-to-Cubie construction and struct integrity', 13, None, None, 'V', 5)
(9, 'Two-corner runtime admission core', 7, None, None, 'V/C', 3)
(10, 'Identity, provenance, attestation, and policy seams', 7)
(11, 'Policy compiler and bytecode VM', 4)
(12, 'Lease, replay, host verifier, and epoch lifecycle', 15, None, None, 'Priority', 'Count')
(13, 'GPU goodput and waste predicates', 20, None, None, 'Future/Research', 26)
(14, 'Capacity accounting and TOCTOU protection', 4, None, None, 'High', 102)
(15, 'OpenVINO, cold path, and risk integers', 4, None, None, 'Medium', 57)
(16, 'HA, split-brain, and degraded availability', 7)
(17, 'Regulatory, CAISI, and governance alignment', 10)
(18, 'Conditional quantum and advanced research path', 14, None, None, 'Action', 'Count')
(None, None, None, None, None, 'Create/formalize', 140)
(None, None, None, None, None, 'Engineering invariant/benchmark', 1)
(None, None, None, None, None, 'Future theorem/research', 14)
(None, None, None, None, None, 'Rewrite/spec guardrail', 22)
(None, None, None, None, None, 'Surface/bind verified result', 8)

=== Legend ===
('Column', 'Meaning')
('RowNo', 'Sequential row number in dependency order. Should be 1 through 185 with no gaps.')
('OriginalID', 'The ID from the consolidated theorem/rewrite backlog.')
('DependencyOrder', 'Cluster-relative dependency order, e.g. 9.1 means Cluster 9 item 1.')
('Type', 'C=create/formalize, V=already verified or reported, R=rewrite/spec rule, E=engineering invariant, F=future research.')
('LikelyMathOrFormula', 'Sketch of the formal statement, invariant, or formula to prove/encode.')
('ProofOrValidationSketch', 'How the theorem, rewrite rule, or engineering invariant would be validated.')
('SequenceCheck', 'Excel formula verifies RowNo = row index; should be OK for all rows.')

=== Sources ===
('Source Basis', 'How used in roadmap')
('Conversation synthesis', 'Primary source for the full theorem/rewrite backlog and dependency order.')
('Cubie Master Stack v1.2', 'Supports verified-stack rows such as V1.50/V2.0 face promotion, lease, epoch, HA, and execution physics claims.')
('CubieBridge V1.40 verification log', 'Supports the two-corner decomposition, GPU failure implies denial, deployment failure implies denial, and independence witnesses.')
('Ramen Corner Consensus V1.19.1 verification log', 'Supports explainable denial matrix and corner-consensus rows.')
('TrustFortress/Blue Shield evidence materials', 'Supports empirical motivation rows around goodput, deny-late waste, context bombs, retry storms, and DCGM blind spots; these remain empirical and need fleet replication.')
('NIST CAISI RFI / governance alignment', 'Used only as regulatory-alignment mapping, not as a binding mandate.')


python -c "
import openpyxl, sys
sys.stdout.reconfigure(encoding='utf-8')
wb = openpyxl.load_workbook(r'C:/Users/NickV/Downloads/cubie_theorem_roadmap_full.xlsx', read_only=True, data_only=True)
ws = wb['Roadmap']
for i, row in enumerate(ws.iter_rows(values_only=True)):
    if i > 40 and any(v is not None for v in row):
        print(row)
    if i > 200:
        break
" 2>&1

Read remaining roadmap rows


<persisted-output>
Output too large (77.8KB). Full output saved to: C:\Users\NickV\.claude\projects\C--Users-NickV\bfc2bfbf-6683-4826-bf18-edd758f725bb\tool-results\b3eu9ehl3.txt

Preview (first 2KB):
(41, 39, '3.7', 3, 'Recursive Cubie access and noise growth', 'Recursive noise amplification theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'Medium', 'Show recursive Golden Path scaling, Crowd failure, and geometry-aware RG.', 'P_fail(N)=1-(1-η)^{E_N}; E_N≈48·54^{N-1}.', 'Independent seam failure complement probability.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(42, 11, '4.1', 4, 'Context, frame, lineage, and unified Golden Path', 'Frame beats geometry theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'Medium', 'Upgrade shape into typed trust geometry that resists frame and lineage spoofing.', 'Same active sites A(Y_1)=A(Y_2)=P_f but Auth(Y_1)=1 and Auth(Y_2)=0 due to frame holonomy.', 'Construct two states differing only in θ; Auth includes FrameOK.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(43, 13, '4.2', 4, 'Context, frame, lineage, and unified Golden Path', 'Lineage-valid Golden Path theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'Medium', 'Upgrade shape into typed trust geometry that resists frame and lineage spoofing.', 'Auth^{(N)}⇒∀ℓ≤N: λ_ℓ⪯λ_{ℓ-1}.', 'Induction along recursive path; each child lineage must extend parent.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
...
</persisted-output>

(41, 39, '3.7', 3, 'Recursive Cubie access and noise growth', 'Recursive noise amplification theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'Medium', 'Show recursive Golden Path scaling, Crowd failure, and geometry-aware RG.', 'P_fail(N)=1-(1-η)^{E_N}; E_N≈48·54^{N-1}.', 'Independent seam failure complement probability.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(42, 11, '4.1', 4, 'Context, frame, lineage, and unified Golden Path', 'Frame beats geometry theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'Medium', 'Upgrade shape into typed trust geometry that resists frame and lineage spoofing.', 'Same active sites A(Y_1)=A(Y_2)=P_f but Auth(Y_1)=1 and Auth(Y_2)=0 due to frame holonomy.', 'Construct two states differing only in θ; Auth includes FrameOK.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(43, 13, '4.2', 4, 'Context, frame, lineage, and unified Golden Path', 'Lineage-valid Golden Path theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'Medium', 'Upgrade shape into typed trust geometry that resists frame and lineage spoofing.', 'Auth^{(N)}⇒∀ℓ≤N: λ_ℓ⪯λ_{ℓ-1}.', 'Induction along recursive path; each child lineage must extend parent.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(44, 14, '4.3', 4, 'Context, frame, lineage, and unified Golden Path', 'Context-color-frame-lineage Golden Path theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'Medium', 'Upgrade shape into typed trust geometry that resists frame and lineage spoofing.', 'Auth iff ∃ path where each level is Plus-complete ∧ context-valid ∧ color-valid ∧ frame-aligned ∧ lineage-valid.', 'Combine predicates into a single iff by nested existential over levels.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(45, 18, '5.1', 5, 'Seam strings, corners, and explainable denial', 'Seam-string composition theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'High', 'Formalize path-dependent authorization and human-readable denial causes.', 'Π=e_1∘...∘e_m; J(Π)=∧_{i=1}^m J(e_i); J(Π)=1 ⇔ ∀i,J(e_i)=1.', 'Boolean conjunction over path elements.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(46, 19, '5.2', 5, 'Seam strings, corners, and explainable denial', 'Seam failure localization theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'High', 'Formalize path-dependent authorization and human-readable denial causes.', 'J(Π)=0 ⇒ ∃e_i∈Π:J(e_i)=0; D(Π)={e_i:J(e_i)=0}.', 'Finite conjunction false iff at least one component false.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(47, 20, '5.3', 5, 'Seam strings, corners, and explainable denial', 'Non-commutative seam ordering theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'High', 'Formalize path-dependent authorization and human-readable denial causes.', '∃A,B: J(A∘B)≠J(B∘A).', 'Counterexample: approval-before-deploy vs deploy-before-approval.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(48, 6, '5.4', 5, 'Seam strings, corners, and explainable denial', 'Corner consensus theorem', 'V/C', 'Surface/bind verified result', 'High', 'Formalize path-dependent authorization and human-readable denial causes.', 'K_v=min(J_{e1},J_{e2},J_{e3}); WriteOK requires K_v≥τ_v.', 'If any incident seam <τ, min <τ; Boolean version uses conjunction.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(49, 7, '5.5', 5, 'Seam strings, corners, and explainable denial', 'Explainable denial certificate theorem', 'V/C', 'Surface/bind verified result', 'High', 'Formalize path-dependent authorization and human-readable denial causes.', 'D(v,a)={(e,r):J_r(e)<τ_r}; D≠∅⇒Auth=0; D=∅ iff no typed seam failure.', 'Map failed predicates to denial set.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(50, 16, '5.6', 5, 'Seam strings, corners, and explainable denial', 'Edge-seam decomposition theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'High', 'Formalize path-dependent authorization and human-readable denial causes.', 'FaceOK ⇏ SeamsOK; Admit requires FaceOK∧SeamsOK∧CornerOK.', 'Construct clean local face values with inconsistent cross-face seam.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(51, 31, '5.7', 5, 'Seam strings, corners, and explainable denial', 'Surface-only monitor insufficiency theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'High', 'Formalize path-dependent authorization and human-readable denial causes.', '∃W0,W1: M(W0)=M(W1) but Auth(W0)≠Auth(W1) for monitor restricted to surface projection.', 'Use hidden seam flip while holding projection fixed.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(52, 105, '5.8', 5, 'Seam strings, corners, and explainable denial', 'Denial certificate completeness', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'High', 'Formalize path-dependent authorization and human-readable denial causes.', 'Decision=DENY ⇒ ∃d∈DenialCertificate identifying a failed predicate.', 'Follow from denial-certificate construction over failure set.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(53, 106, '5.9', 5, 'Seam strings, corners, and explainable denial', 'Denial certificate soundness', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'High', 'Formalize path-dependent authorization and human-readable denial causes.', 'd∈DenialCertificate(r) ⇒ Predicate_d(r)=0.', 'Each certificate item is generated only from failed predicate.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(54, 5, '6.1', 6, 'Surface spoofing and face promotion', 'Surface-spoofing separation theorem', 'C/V', 'Create/formalize', 'Future/Research', 'Lift seam-level attacks to surface/face-level separations and 54-predicate diagnostics.', 'Π_vis(W0)=Π_vis(W1), δ_vis(W0)=δ_vis(W1), but Auth*(W0)=1 and Auth*(W1)=0.', 'Hold visible projection fixed and flip hidden seam predicate.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(55, 17, '6.2', 6, 'Surface spoofing and face promotion', 'Same face projection, different seam assignment theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'Future/Research', 'Lift seam-level attacks to surface/face-level separations and 54-predicate diagnostics.', 'FaceProjection(r1)=FaceProjection(r2) but SeamsOK(r1)=1 and SeamsOK(r2)=0.', 'Construct identical six-face visible values with mismatched lineage/runtime seam.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(56, 61, '6.3', 6, 'Surface spoofing and face promotion', 'CubieRequest face-promotion theorem', 'V', 'Surface/bind verified result', 'Future/Research', 'Lift seam-level attacks to surface/face-level separations and 54-predicate diagnostics.', 'Seven-dimensional seam substrate promotes to 54-predicate CubieRequest while preserving admission semantics.', 'Reported V1.50-style refinement; prove predicate equivalence.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(57, 62, '6.4', 6, 'Surface spoofing and face promotion', 'Face-localized denial theorem', 'V/C', 'Surface/bind verified result', 'Future/Research', 'Lift seam-level attacks to surface/face-level separations and 54-predicate diagnostics.', 'For every face predicate p_i, p_i=0 produces face-localized denial.', 'Case split over 54 predicates and map to denial theorem.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(58, 63, '6.5', 6, 'Surface spoofing and face promotion', 'Admit implies every required face passed', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'Future/Research', 'Lift seam-level attacks to surface/face-level separations and 54-predicate diagnostics.', 'Admit(C)=1 ⇒ ∀p_i∈Required(C), p_i=1.', 'Converse projection of admission predicate.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(59, 64, '6.6', 6, 'Surface spoofing and face promotion', 'Denial count bounded by 54', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'Future/Research', 'Lift seam-level attacks to surface/face-level separations and 54-predicate diagnostics.', 'D(C)={p_i:p_i=0}; 0≤|D(C)|≤54.', 'Finite set bound over 54 predicates.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(60, 88, '6.7', 6, 'Surface spoofing and face promotion', 'Head-shape spoofing separation theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'Future/Research', 'Lift seam-level attacks to surface/face-level separations and 54-predicate diagnostics.', 'VisibleModel(r1)=VisibleModel(r2), HeadShape(r1)≠HeadShape(r2), Admit(r1)≠Admit(r2).', 'Same visible route/model label; hidden Q/KV geometry mismatch changes waste_ok.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(61, 132, '6.8', 6, 'Surface spoofing and face promotion', 'Indirect prompt-injection surface-seam separation theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'Future/Research', 'Lift seam-level attacks to surface/face-level separations and 54-predicate diagnostics.', 'Surface(call1)=Surface(call2), Seams(call1)≠Seams(call2), Admit differs.', 'Tool call syntax same; hidden purpose/lineage/scope seam differs.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(62, 55, '7.1', 7, 'Agentic recursion and delegated permissions', 'Delegated permission composition algebra', 'C/R', 'Create/formalize', 'Medium', 'Bound subagent authority, recursion depth, and cryptographic delegation chains.', 'C_{i+1}=C_i⊗d_i; Perm(C_{i+1})⊆Perm(C_i), Scope(C_{i+1})≤Scope(C_i), TTL(C_{i+1})≤TTL(C_i).', 'Induct over delegation events.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(63, 23, '7.2', 7, 'Agentic recursion and delegated permissions', 'Subagent permission attenuation theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'Medium', 'Bound subagent authority, recursion depth, and cryptographic delegation chains.', 'Perm(child)⊆Perm(parent), Scope(child)≤Scope(parent), TTL(child)≤TTL(parent).', 'Direct subset/order proof from attenuation rules.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(64, 24, '7.3', 7, 'Agentic recursion and delegated permissions', 'Recursive depth bound theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'Medium', 'Bound subagent authority, recursion depth, and cryptographic delegation chains.', 'Depth(child)=Depth(parent)+1 and Depth(C)≤D_max.', 'Induction on child creation; reject if depth exceeds ceiling.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(65, 99, '7.4', 7, 'Agentic recursion and delegated permissions', 'Depth-ceiling liveness/safety theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'Medium', 'Bound subagent authority, recursion depth, and cryptographic delegation chains.', 'Depth(child)=Depth(parent)+1≤D_max.', 'Bounded recursion guarantees finite verification work.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(66, 145, '7.5', 7, 'Agentic recursion and delegated permissions', 'Depth ceiling rejection theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'Medium', 'Bound subagent authority, recursion depth, and cryptographic delegation chains.', 'current_depth>D_max ⇒ Admit=0.', 'Predicate check in parser or delegation verifier.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(67, 25, '7.6', 7, 'Agentic recursion and delegated permissions', 'Parent-signed child Cubie theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'Medium', 'Bound subagent authority, recursion depth, and cryptographic delegation chains.', 'Verify_{K_p}(sig_parent(C_child, Scope_child, TTL_child, λ_parent))=1.', 'Signature/MAC verification is a precondition of valid child.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(68, 139, '7.7', 7, 'Agentic recursion and delegated permissions', 'Cryptographic subagent chaining theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'Medium', 'Bound subagent authority, recursion depth, and cryptographic delegation chains.', 'Child Cubie valid only if Verify(parent_sig,C_child)=1 or VerifyMAC(parent_key,C_child)=1.', 'Prove no unsigned child can satisfy ChildValid.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(69, 56, '7.8', 7, 'Agentic recursion and delegated permissions', 'Proof-carrying delegation chain', 'C/R', 'Create/formalize', 'Medium', 'Bound subagent authority, recursion depth, and cryptographic delegation chains.', 'Delegation chain valid iff each child carries a verifiable parent attenuation proof.', 'Replace speculative ZK claim with concrete proof-carrying chain.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(70, 97, '7.9', 7, 'Agentic recursion and delegated permissions', 'Symmetric fast-path capability chain theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'Medium', 'Bound subagent authority, recursion depth, and cryptographic delegation chains.', 'VerifyChain(C0→Cn)=O(D_max)=O(1) when D_max is compile-time bounded.', 'Bounded chain length and symmetric MAC verification.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(71, 140, '7.10', 7, 'Agentic recursion and delegated permissions', 'Symmetric fast-path constraint theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'Medium', 'Bound subagent authority, recursion depth, and cryptographic delegation chains.', 'Sub-100µs delegation excludes asymmetric nested JWTs; use bounded symmetric MAC chains.', 'Operation-count argument.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(72, 98, '7.11', 7, 'Agentic recursion and delegated permissions', 'Parent capability HMAC binding theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'Medium', 'Bound subagent authority, recursion depth, and cryptographic delegation chains.', 'HMAC(parent_key, child_scope || child_ttl || parent_hash)=capability_hmac.', 'Forge resistance reduces to MAC security assumption.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(73, 141, '7.12', 7, 'Agentic recursion and delegated permissions', 'Capability HMAC binding theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'Medium', 'Bound subagent authority, recursion depth, and cryptographic delegation chains.', 'HMAC_k(request_hash||parent_request_hash||parent_chain_hash||scope||ttl||depth).', 'Binds capability to request, parent, chain, scope, and depth.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(74, 142, '7.13', 7, 'Agentic recursion and delegated permissions', 'Parent request hash continuity', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'Medium', 'Bound subagent authority, recursion depth, and cryptographic delegation chains.', 'parent_request_hash(C_i)=request_hash(C_{i-1}).', 'Validate chain link by equality.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(75, 143, '7.14', 7, 'Agentic recursion and delegated permissions', 'Parent chain hash continuity', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'Medium', 'Bound subagent authority, recursion depth, and cryptographic delegation chains.', 'parent_chain_hash(C_i)=H(parent_chain_hash(C_{i-1})||request_hash(C_i)).', 'Hash-chain induction.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(76, 144, '7.15', 7, 'Agentic recursion and delegated permissions', 'Delegation depth consistency', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'Medium', 'Bound subagent authority, recursion depth, and cryptographic delegation chains.', 'current_depth(child)=delegation_depth(parent)+1.', 'Check counters across parent and child.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(77, 26, '7.16', 7, 'Agentic recursion and delegated permissions', 'No privilege escalation along seam-string theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'Medium', 'Bound subagent authority, recursion depth, and cryptographic delegation chains.', 'If every child attenuates, Perm(C_N)⊆Perm(C_0).', 'Transitive subset induction.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(78, 27, '7.17', 7, 'Agentic recursion and delegated permissions', 'Context-loop denial theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'Medium', 'Bound subagent authority, recursion depth, and cryptographic delegation chains.', 'Loop(r)=1 ⇒ Admit(r)=0 or Decision∈{THROTTLE, ASYNC_QUEUE, DENY}.', 'Define loop predicate over caller/payload/window and map to waste_ok=0.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(79, 137, '7.18', 7, 'Agentic recursion and delegated permissions', 'Linear lease anti-runaway theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'Medium', 'Bound subagent authority, recursion depth, and cryptographic delegation chains.', 'consume(h)=1 ⇒ reuse(h)=0.', 'Consumed-hash ledger membership denies reuse.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(80, 138, '7.19', 7, 'Agentic recursion and delegated permissions', 'Runaway agent bounded-authority theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'Medium', 'Bound subagent authority, recursion depth, and cryptographic delegation chains.', 'Attenuation + TTL bound + Depth≤D_max prevents authority expansion and infinite chain execution.', 'Combine subset, time, and depth induction.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(81, 100, '8.1', 8, 'Request-to-Cubie construction and struct integrity', 'Request-to-Cubie totality theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'High', 'Make every runtime request deterministically parse into a complete CubieRequest.', 'WellFormed(r) ⇒ ∃!C: Parse(r)=C.', 'Deterministic parser construction.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(82, 101, '8.2', 8, 'Request-to-Cubie construction and struct integrity', 'Request-to-Cubie rejection theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'High', 'Make every runtime request deterministically parse into a complete CubieRequest.', '¬WellFormed(r) ⇒ Decision(r)=DENY_MALFORMED.', 'Parser rejects missing/malformed fields.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(83, 102, '8.3', 8, 'Request-to-Cubie construction and struct integrity', 'CubieRequest determinism theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'High', 'Make every runtime request deterministically parse into a complete CubieRequest.', 'Same request envelope + same epochs ⇒ same CubieRequest and same Decision.', 'Pure function over fixed inputs.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(84, 103, '8.4', 8, 'Request-to-Cubie construction and struct integrity', 'Output-state exhaustiveness theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'High', 'Make every runtime request deterministically parse into a complete CubieRequest.', 'Decision∈{ALLOW,DENY,THROTTLE,REROUTE,ASYNC_QUEUE,REQUIRE_APPROVAL,QUARANTINE}.', 'Enumerated decision type covers all branches.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(85, 104, '8.5', 8, 'Request-to-Cubie construction and struct integrity', 'Output-state exclusivity theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'High', 'Make every runtime request deterministically parse into a complete CubieRequest.', 'Decision(r)=ALLOW ⇒ Decision(r)≠DENY and mutually exclusive terminal states.', 'Tagged-union/exclusive enum proof.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(86, 146, '8.6', 8, 'Request-to-Cubie construction and struct integrity', 'Payload hash restoration theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'High', 'Make every runtime request deterministically parse into a complete CubieRequest.', 'payload_hash=∅ ⇒ PayloadTamperDetect=0.', 'Lease cannot bind execution payload without hash.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(87, 147, '8.7', 8, 'Request-to-Cubie construction and struct integrity', 'Telemetry epoch type-width theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'High', 'Make every runtime request deterministically parse into a complete CubieRequest.', 'valid_for_telemetry_epoch:u64 and telemetry_epoch:u64.', 'Type-coherence proof/prevent truncation.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(88, 148, '8.8', 8, 'Request-to-Cubie construction and struct integrity', 'Lease nonce capability binding theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'High', 'Make every runtime request deterministically parse into a complete CubieRequest.', 'capability_hmac=HMAC_k(lease_nonce||request_hash||scope||epoch).', 'MAC binds nonce, request, scope, and epoch.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(89, 183, '8.9', 8, 'Request-to-Cubie construction and struct integrity', 'Rust runtime struct completeness theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'High', 'Make every runtime request deterministically parse into a complete CubieRequest.', 'Every required admission/delegation/replay/capacity/adapter/epoch field exists in CubieRequest.', 'Compare required-field set to struct-field set.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(90, 184, '8.10', 8, 'Request-to-Cubie construction and struct integrity', 'Rust type coherence theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'High', 'Make every runtime request deterministically parse into a complete CubieRequest.', 'Fields compared or hashed into same epoch domain have equal-width types.', 'Static type relation/compile-time check.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(91, 165, '8.11', 8, 'Request-to-Cubie construction and struct integrity', 'Parse envelope field completeness theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'High', 'Make every runtime request deterministically parse into a complete CubieRequest.', 'Required delegation/adapter fields missing ⇒ DENY_MALFORMED.', 'Field-presence validation.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(92, 166, '8.12', 8, 'Request-to-Cubie construction and struct integrity', 'Pseudocode/struct synchronization theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'High', 'Make every runtime request deterministically parse into a complete CubieRequest.', 'field∈Pseudocode⇒field∈CubieRequest and required struct fields are parsed.', 'Documentation conformance check.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(93, 185, '8.13', 8, 'Request-to-Cubie construction and struct integrity', 'Appendix A algorithmic consistency theorem', 'C', 'Create/formalize', 'High', 'Make every runtime request deterministically parse into a complete CubieRequest.', 'Parse → BuildCube → EvaluateCorners → CapacityDecrement → Lease.', 'Verify pseudocode ordering no lease before decrement.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this chat roadmap; verified-stack items reference Cubie Master Stack / V1.40 / Ramen logs where applicable.', 'OK')
(94, 57, '9.1', 9, 'Two-corner runtime admission core', 'Two-corner admission decomposition theorem', 'V', 'Surface/bind verified result', 'High', 'Make the verified Deployment Corner and GPU Corner the runtime authority spine.', 'WriteOK(c,policyOK) ⇔ GPUCorner(c) ∧ DeploymentCorner(c) ∧ Topology(c) ∧ policyOK.', 'Verified by V1.40-style boolean decomposition.', 'Builds on prior clusters in dependency order; see DependencyOrder.', 'Synthesized from this ch


pip install pdfplumber -q 2>&1 && python -c "
import sys
sys.stdout.reconfigure(encoding='utf-8')
import pdfplumber
pdf = pdfplumber.open(r'C:/Users/NickV/Downloads/v1_0 CubieMasterStack 0430.pdf')
print(f'Pages: {len(pdf.pages)}')
for i, page in enumerate(pdf.pages):
    text = page.extract_text()
    if text:
        print(f'\n--- PAGE {i+1} ---')
        print(text)
" 2>&1

Install pdfplumber and extract CubieMasterStack PDF